Hi all,
My employer had not paid me for 4 months, citing financial problems. Eventually being broke caught up and I had to resign and join elsewhere. It's been three months since I left the company and I still haven't received any salary. The employer continues to allege financial problems and has refused to give any status on when the salaries can be paid.
Is there any legal recourse for such problems? Are there any good labour lawyers in Mumbai city that take up such cases to completion?
Thanks all.
From India, Mumbai
My employer had not paid me for 4 months, citing financial problems. Eventually being broke caught up and I had to resign and join elsewhere. It's been three months since I left the company and I still haven't received any salary. The employer continues to allege financial problems and has refused to give any status on when the salaries can be paid.
Is there any legal recourse for such problems? Are there any good labour lawyers in Mumbai city that take up such cases to completion?
Thanks all.
From India, Mumbai
If you were drawing salary not more than Rs 10000, then you can take assistance of the Labor Court. You have to move petition following section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act. If you were drawing more than Rs 10000, then the amount due shall be recovered following Civil Procedures only.
Make your demand for salary in writing to the employer stating: " I will be constrained to move to the appropriate authorities for recovery of the amount as arrears of land revenue if the amount due is not paid to me within 2 weeks ".
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
4250Make your demand for salary in writing to the employer stating: " I will be constrained to move to the appropriate authorities for recovery of the amount as arrears of land revenue if the amount due is not paid to me within 2 weeks ".
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
While it is appropriate to take action as eloborated by Madhu at this stage, can someone point out if some action could have been taken at the early stage of nonpayment say after a month or so.
First you check that is your last employer is Bankrupt or not? If yes, did he notified by the hon’ble court or not that he/she is bankrupt. Rgds Bhagwan
From India, Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
In the initial period of non receipt of salary also one can proceed against the employer provided he has not been paid salary within 7 days of any wage period. However, an employer employing 1000 or more workers can oay wages within 10th day of wage period.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
@cgnanij : Awaiting your response :)
@Madhu.T.K: I unfortunately was drawing more than 10K. Thank you for your input. I'm hoping to get proper legal representation before initiating any new contact with my ex-employer. When you mean in writing, what would you really mean. Would email do, or does this have to be printed signed mail?
@colvirendra: Yes, that information would really benefit someone who has just started a nightmare.
@tsivasankaran: I was working with my defaulting employer in a senior management role. I had a seven figure salary. I'm now working elsewhere, thankfully not at a competitors, so that's not an excuse that can come up.
@bhagwan_07: I doubt they have declared bankruptcy. They are still conducting business as usual. Does being bankrupt impact my ability to recover my dues?
Thank you all for your interest and responses. If you would please recommend a good legal consultant who specializes in civil labor and advise a proper path ahead, I would be very grateful.
From India, Mumbai
@Madhu.T.K: I unfortunately was drawing more than 10K. Thank you for your input. I'm hoping to get proper legal representation before initiating any new contact with my ex-employer. When you mean in writing, what would you really mean. Would email do, or does this have to be printed signed mail?
@colvirendra: Yes, that information would really benefit someone who has just started a nightmare.
@tsivasankaran: I was working with my defaulting employer in a senior management role. I had a seven figure salary. I'm now working elsewhere, thankfully not at a competitors, so that's not an excuse that can come up.
@bhagwan_07: I doubt they have declared bankruptcy. They are still conducting business as usual. Does being bankrupt impact my ability to recover my dues?
Thank you all for your interest and responses. If you would please recommend a good legal consultant who specializes in civil labor and advise a proper path ahead, I would be very grateful.
From India, Mumbai
Hi
Senior management cadre and workingf in some other company.
Whatever you do legally now onwards, keep your present employer informed and proceed.
You have two option.
1. Move a civil court for breach of contract. This takes very long time and involves exprnses
2. There is a provision under the Shops and Establishments Act for Emploiyees to represent their cases. You can file a petition under this Act I am not very sure of this provision in Bomby but in Chennai this provision is avavilable.
In all probability all Shops Acts will have this provision
This is faster and you can consult your advocate on this
Siva
From India, Chennai
Senior management cadre and workingf in some other company.
Whatever you do legally now onwards, keep your present employer informed and proceed.
You have two option.
1. Move a civil court for breach of contract. This takes very long time and involves exprnses
2. There is a provision under the Shops and Establishments Act for Emploiyees to represent their cases. You can file a petition under this Act I am not very sure of this provision in Bomby but in Chennai this provision is avavilable.
In all probability all Shops Acts will have this provision
This is faster and you can consult your advocate on this
Siva
From India, Chennai
Dear Mr Ghosh
I am reproducing below the provisions relating to claims. I am sure you must have been working in an office which would have been registered under the Shops and Establishments Act. This provision is taken from Delhi Act I am sure similar provisions are availble in Bombay Act as well
Sec 25 Claim related to wages (1)
The Government may by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint any Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act or other officer with experience as a Judge of a Civil Court or as a Stipendiary Magistrate to be the authority to hear and decide all claims arising out of delayed payment or non-payment of earned wages of an employee employed in any establishment.
(2) Application for any such claim may be made to the authority appointed under sub-section (1) by the employee himself or any Official of a registered trade union authorised in writing to act on his behalf or any legal practitioner or the Chief Inspector for a direction under sub-section (3):
Provided that every such application should be presented within one year from the date the claim for such wages has become payable under this Act:
Provided further that an application may be admitted after the said period of one year when the applicant satisfies the authority that he had sufficient cause for not making the application within such period.
(3) When any application under sub-section (2) is entertained, the authority shall hear the applicant and the employer, or give them an opportunity of being heard and after such further enquiry, if any, as it may consider necessary may without prejudice to any other penalty to which employer may be liable under this Act, direct the payment to the employee of the amount due to him together with the payment of such compensation as the authority may think fit, not exceeding half the amount so due or Rs. 100, whichever is less.
(4) If the authority hearing any application under this section is satisfied that it was either malicious or vexatious, it may direct that a penalty not exceeding hundred rupees be paid to the employer by the person presenting the application.
(5) Any amount directed to be paid under this section may be recovered:
(a) if the authority is a magistrate, by the authority as if it was a fine imposed by the authority as a magistrate, or
(b) if the authority is not a magistrate, by any magistrate to whom the authority makes application in this behalf, as if it were a fine imposed by such magistrate.
(6) Every direction of the authority under this section shall be final.
(7) Every authority appointed under sub-section (1) shall have all powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) for the purpose of taking evidence and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and compelling the production of documents, and every such authority shall be deemed to be a civil court for all the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXXV of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (
Siva
From India, Chennai
I am reproducing below the provisions relating to claims. I am sure you must have been working in an office which would have been registered under the Shops and Establishments Act. This provision is taken from Delhi Act I am sure similar provisions are availble in Bombay Act as well
Sec 25 Claim related to wages (1)
The Government may by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint any Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act or other officer with experience as a Judge of a Civil Court or as a Stipendiary Magistrate to be the authority to hear and decide all claims arising out of delayed payment or non-payment of earned wages of an employee employed in any establishment.
(2) Application for any such claim may be made to the authority appointed under sub-section (1) by the employee himself or any Official of a registered trade union authorised in writing to act on his behalf or any legal practitioner or the Chief Inspector for a direction under sub-section (3):
Provided that every such application should be presented within one year from the date the claim for such wages has become payable under this Act:
Provided further that an application may be admitted after the said period of one year when the applicant satisfies the authority that he had sufficient cause for not making the application within such period.
(3) When any application under sub-section (2) is entertained, the authority shall hear the applicant and the employer, or give them an opportunity of being heard and after such further enquiry, if any, as it may consider necessary may without prejudice to any other penalty to which employer may be liable under this Act, direct the payment to the employee of the amount due to him together with the payment of such compensation as the authority may think fit, not exceeding half the amount so due or Rs. 100, whichever is less.
(4) If the authority hearing any application under this section is satisfied that it was either malicious or vexatious, it may direct that a penalty not exceeding hundred rupees be paid to the employer by the person presenting the application.
(5) Any amount directed to be paid under this section may be recovered:
(a) if the authority is a magistrate, by the authority as if it was a fine imposed by the authority as a magistrate, or
(b) if the authority is not a magistrate, by any magistrate to whom the authority makes application in this behalf, as if it were a fine imposed by such magistrate.
(6) Every direction of the authority under this section shall be final.
(7) Every authority appointed under sub-section (1) shall have all powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) for the purpose of taking evidence and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and compelling the production of documents, and every such authority shall be deemed to be a civil court for all the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXXV of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (
Siva
From India, Chennai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Salary-Note.doc
SALARY SHEET CALCULATION.xls