No Tags Found!

Dear Members
Attached Supreme Court Judgement under ESI Act is short of new dispute which requires in-depth discussion and I humbly request Respected Members to write article on it in the present thread.
HIREN CHHEDA
09821078457

From India, Mumbai
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf SC 09 ESI IMP on Applicability.pdf (355.0 KB, 2757 views)

Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Hiren, I think these are an important judgements and hope this will help to all HR & IR professionals. Avinash Kanoray
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

In my opinion this judgement has peculiar set of fact such as daily employees or wages r engaged for work, so the mgmt could not identity them daily and also feels that they r cannot or may be willing to get engaged daily. Thus impleading the workers as party to proceeding wud araise....
In other regular case like fight to extra or wrong contribution calculations the impleading of workers would not arise.

From India, Tiruchchirappalli
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Friends,

I want to clear my doubt on the following issues: If any additional construction work is being done on the premises of the factory, is ESI payable for contract labor engaged in the construction work?

From India, Shillong
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf SUPREME COURT-STAY ORDER (ESI IN CONST.) UPLOADED INTO ESI PORTAL.pdf (220.3 KB, 255 views)

Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Register and Log In.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.