I am not convinced by the reply, rather the manner in which the reply has been posted by Avinash Dhomse. It seems that many of us who have given advise on the matter are irrelevant and only the reply given by Avinash should be followed and for further queries relating to it Umapath Dhanraj shall contact him only and that also privately mailing him. This should be interpreted as if we all have given wrong guidance and our guidance should not be followed.
Regarding what Avinash has said about the solution also I have difference of opinion. Not sending resignation letter and not accepting letters sent by the previous company will not make any difference and if he does so, I feel, that would be a conclusive proof that the employee has abandoned the job. Our intention here is to avoid such scenario and make the leaving proper.
I would also like to say that this is a forum wherein a solution is arrived at by means of brain storming and I would also like to state that this is not a forum to canvass clients.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
4250Regarding what Avinash has said about the solution also I have difference of opinion. Not sending resignation letter and not accepting letters sent by the previous company will not make any difference and if he does so, I feel, that would be a conclusive proof that the employee has abandoned the job. Our intention here is to avoid such scenario and make the leaving proper.
I would also like to say that this is a forum wherein a solution is arrived at by means of brain storming and I would also like to state that this is not a forum to canvass clients.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
NASSCOM skill registry does not verify anything but simply accepts what is added by employers (NASSCOM members).
It's a voluntary database and therefore there is no statutory rules. Only what internally NASSCOM applies.
I suppose there must be an internal grievance handling procedure. But I have not heard of anyone using the same.
In case it is ever challenged in court, I suspect the database will be dismantled since there is no natural justice. NASSCOM while being a private organisation (Union of employers), it will be liable for conspiracy to deny right to employment. However, no one has the money or time to take up the challenge.
From India, Mumbai
It's a voluntary database and therefore there is no statutory rules. Only what internally NASSCOM applies.
I suppose there must be an internal grievance handling procedure. But I have not heard of anyone using the same.
In case it is ever challenged in court, I suspect the database will be dismantled since there is no natural justice. NASSCOM while being a private organisation (Union of employers), it will be liable for conspiracy to deny right to employment. However, no one has the money or time to take up the challenge.
From India, Mumbai
I am with Madhu TK's remarks reg Avinash Dhomse's suggestions.
@ Avinash Dhomse--
Pl note that the thread initiator has NOT QUIT....like you mentioned. HE ABSCONDED....which is hell-of-a-difference.
Also, those with some amount of experience in this Forum would know that the inputs/info by any thread initiator would, in many instances be EITHER incomplete [by the inability to judge what to mention & what not to] OR plain partial [by intent].
I have a 'very strong feeling' that this thread initiator has purposely chosen to give ONLY those facts of the case that suit or effect him [comes into the category of "what I said is completely true, but not the complete truth"]. THREE reasons for this:
1] He used multiple aliases--not an issue per-se, but he hasn't bothered to give reasons.
2] Where is he since his last posting on 11 Oct--when all the members have been spending time to focus on giving him actionable solutions/suggestions?
3] He says it's an MNC. MNCs usually have very clear methods/processes of handling any escalation of issues--this one leading to the filing of FIR--especially when possible actions lead outside the Company. Was this initiator being very frugal with the truth OR HIS version of it?
And also, I think, it's only fair to bear in-mind that original intent of this Forum--that of sharing of issues/problems ALONG WITH their solutions--so tht everyone can benefit.
And Saswata Banerjee is right about NASSCOM--like with any facility, some Companies do misuse NASSCOM too. Until someone takes it up, i.e.
Rgds,
TS
From India, Hyderabad
@ Avinash Dhomse--
Pl note that the thread initiator has NOT QUIT....like you mentioned. HE ABSCONDED....which is hell-of-a-difference.
Also, those with some amount of experience in this Forum would know that the inputs/info by any thread initiator would, in many instances be EITHER incomplete [by the inability to judge what to mention & what not to] OR plain partial [by intent].
I have a 'very strong feeling' that this thread initiator has purposely chosen to give ONLY those facts of the case that suit or effect him [comes into the category of "what I said is completely true, but not the complete truth"]. THREE reasons for this:
1] He used multiple aliases--not an issue per-se, but he hasn't bothered to give reasons.
2] Where is he since his last posting on 11 Oct--when all the members have been spending time to focus on giving him actionable solutions/suggestions?
3] He says it's an MNC. MNCs usually have very clear methods/processes of handling any escalation of issues--this one leading to the filing of FIR--especially when possible actions lead outside the Company. Was this initiator being very frugal with the truth OR HIS version of it?
And also, I think, it's only fair to bear in-mind that original intent of this Forum--that of sharing of issues/problems ALONG WITH their solutions--so tht everyone can benefit.
And Saswata Banerjee is right about NASSCOM--like with any facility, some Companies do misuse NASSCOM too. Until someone takes it up, i.e.
Rgds,
TS
From India, Hyderabad
Hi all,
Thanks for your replies. I decided to go with Octavius by dropping the mail for revoking the offer and i communicated to them orally my unwillingness to work for the other company.There was no follow up from the other company and i ignored that chapter. Regarding aliases, i got those questions in mail from my friend and i copy pasted without removing the signature, i tried to edit but was not able to do so.So i changed the status to anonymous.
This is of course my version of story happened but it is the one which actually happened. I am still waiting for their reply to proceed further but there is no reply as of now from their side.Will keep everyone updated when i get reply. Once again thanks for your valuable time.
From India, Bangalore
Thanks for your replies. I decided to go with Octavius by dropping the mail for revoking the offer and i communicated to them orally my unwillingness to work for the other company.There was no follow up from the other company and i ignored that chapter. Regarding aliases, i got those questions in mail from my friend and i copy pasted without removing the signature, i tried to edit but was not able to do so.So i changed the status to anonymous.
This is of course my version of story happened but it is the one which actually happened. I am still waiting for their reply to proceed further but there is no reply as of now from their side.Will keep everyone updated when i get reply. Once again thanks for your valuable time.
From India, Bangalore
It's problem of mine only....but he wants to know whether the action affects NSR and others.... Its better to concentrate on the problem rather than analysing the identity...the solution is going to be same irrespective of whom asking the question.
From India, Bangalore
From India, Bangalore
While this forum is more interested in exchange of knowledge and ideas, we are also interested in knowing whether we are faffing in the air or actually helping someone. Else I can create a new case study every day for the forum to discuss.
So it pays to be truthful, give all information and post in a manner that the members feel it's real. You posting someone else query as your own, using multiple names, etc does not reflect nicely.
Anyway, you have hopefully got answers you are looking for
From India, Mumbai
So it pays to be truthful, give all information and post in a manner that the members feel it's real. You posting someone else query as your own, using multiple names, etc does not reflect nicely.
Anyway, you have hopefully got answers you are looking for
From India, Mumbai
I already mentioned clearly my friend wants to know whether my action may result in NSR / NASCOM. I updated it. These were my queries too...Do you expect each query need to be start as new discussion?..Besides this forum addresses all the queries and it depends on the people to decide whether they need to register their answer or not. So if you are not interested to register your answer then please refrain yourselves rather than diverting the actual cause..there are many people who are there to help irrespective of the nature of problem one is actually into.when a person needs help then only he will post and not like he is not having anything to do that's why he is wasting others time.Those who have posted their suggestion I thank for their valuable time. Your answers made me to come normal rather than thinking repeatedly of the same problem. So don't consider the above persons comments and refrain your selves from helping. There will be someone who definitely got helped by your useful advises.
From India, Bangalore
From India, Bangalore
Dear Umapathh
If you are so worried about NASSCOM skill registry , then visit the website of NASSCOM skill registry itself.
When you visit NASSCOM skill registry , you will be able to clearly read the following statement "The profile of the knowledge professional is controlled by the candidate himself in all aspect."
I am positively affirmative that you would appreciate my absence from this discussion henceforth.
Regards
Octavious
From India, Mumbai
If you are so worried about NASSCOM skill registry , then visit the website of NASSCOM skill registry itself.
When you visit NASSCOM skill registry , you will be able to clearly read the following statement "The profile of the knowledge professional is controlled by the candidate himself in all aspect."
I am positively affirmative that you would appreciate my absence from this discussion henceforth.
Regards
Octavious
From India, Mumbai
I have never gone to NSR Part of the site, so I only have second hand info.
There is a part of NSR that is visible only to employers.
It gives the blacklist. That is, details of former employees who have been blacklisted by the employers and reasons thereof. NASSCOM members refer to that when hiring. If you are on the blacklist you will not get a job from NASSCOM members as they know you created a problem for someone else. And that is where the most critical function (or dangerous from employee point of view) lies.
Is this blacklist visible to the employees ?
Has anyone checked it ?
Since you have gone to the website, please update my knowledge on this.
From India, Mumbai
There is a part of NSR that is visible only to employers.
It gives the blacklist. That is, details of former employees who have been blacklisted by the employers and reasons thereof. NASSCOM members refer to that when hiring. If you are on the blacklist you will not get a job from NASSCOM members as they know you created a problem for someone else. And that is where the most critical function (or dangerous from employee point of view) lies.
Is this blacklist visible to the employees ?
Has anyone checked it ?
Since you have gone to the website, please update my knowledge on this.
From India, Mumbai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
E-Mail Etiquette Presentation.pp t
Top_Error_Areas _E-mail.xls