Dear colleagues,
I use this story in my illustration on lateral thinking and encourage students to think beyond while facing the impossible problems.
Read below and draw your conclusion from it.
Cheerio
Rajat
"The Way We Think"
Many hundreds of years ago in a small Italian town, a merchant had the misfortune of owing a large sum of money to a moneylender. The moneylender, who was old and ugly, fancied the merchant's beautiful daughter. So he proposed a bargain. He said he would forgo the merchant's debt if he could marry his daughter. Both the merchant and his daughter were horrified by the proposal. So the cunning money-lender suggested that they let providence decide the matter. He told them that he would put a black pebble and a white pebble into an empty money bag. Then the girl would have to pick one pebble from the bag. If she picked the black pebble, she would become his wife and her father's debt would be forgiven. If she picked the white pebble she need not marry him and her father's debt would still be forgiven. But if she refused to pick a pebble, her father would be thrown into jail They were standing on a pebble strewn path in the merchant's garden.
As they talked, the moneylender bent over to pick up two pebbles. As he picked them up, the sharp-eyed girl noticed that he had picked up two black pebbles and put them into the bag. He then asked the girl to pick a pebble from the bag. Now, imagine you were standing in the merchant's garden. What would you have done if you were the girl? If you had to advise her, what would you have told her? Careful analysis would produce three possibilities:
1. The girl should refuse to take a pebble.
2. The girl should show that there were two black pebbles in the bag and expose the money-lender as a cheat.
3. The girl should pick a black pebble and sacrifice herself in order to save her father from his debt and imprisonment.
Take a moment to ponder over the story. The above story is used with the hope that it will make us appreciate the difference between lateral and logical thinking. The girl's dilemma cannot be solved with traditional logical thinking. Think of the consequences if she chooses the above logical answers.
What would you recommend to the Girl to do? The girl manage to solve the dilemma by applying lateral thinking. What did she do?
The girl put her hand into the moneybag and drew out a pebble. Without looking at it, she fumbled and let it fall onto the pebble-strewn path where it immediately became lost among all the other pebbles. "Oh, how clumsy of me," she said. "But never mind, if you look into the bag for the one that is left, you will be able to tell which pebble I picked."
Since the remaining pebble is black, it must be assumed that she had picked the white one. And since the money-lender dared not admit his dishonesty, the girl changed what seemed an impossible situation into an extremely advantageous one.
MORALE OF THE STORY:
Most complex problems do have a solution- it is, only, that we don't attempt to think.
From India, Pune
101I use this story in my illustration on lateral thinking and encourage students to think beyond while facing the impossible problems.
Read below and draw your conclusion from it.
Cheerio
Rajat
"The Way We Think"
Many hundreds of years ago in a small Italian town, a merchant had the misfortune of owing a large sum of money to a moneylender. The moneylender, who was old and ugly, fancied the merchant's beautiful daughter. So he proposed a bargain. He said he would forgo the merchant's debt if he could marry his daughter. Both the merchant and his daughter were horrified by the proposal. So the cunning money-lender suggested that they let providence decide the matter. He told them that he would put a black pebble and a white pebble into an empty money bag. Then the girl would have to pick one pebble from the bag. If she picked the black pebble, she would become his wife and her father's debt would be forgiven. If she picked the white pebble she need not marry him and her father's debt would still be forgiven. But if she refused to pick a pebble, her father would be thrown into jail They were standing on a pebble strewn path in the merchant's garden.
As they talked, the moneylender bent over to pick up two pebbles. As he picked them up, the sharp-eyed girl noticed that he had picked up two black pebbles and put them into the bag. He then asked the girl to pick a pebble from the bag. Now, imagine you were standing in the merchant's garden. What would you have done if you were the girl? If you had to advise her, what would you have told her? Careful analysis would produce three possibilities:
1. The girl should refuse to take a pebble.
2. The girl should show that there were two black pebbles in the bag and expose the money-lender as a cheat.
3. The girl should pick a black pebble and sacrifice herself in order to save her father from his debt and imprisonment.
Take a moment to ponder over the story. The above story is used with the hope that it will make us appreciate the difference between lateral and logical thinking. The girl's dilemma cannot be solved with traditional logical thinking. Think of the consequences if she chooses the above logical answers.
What would you recommend to the Girl to do? The girl manage to solve the dilemma by applying lateral thinking. What did she do?
The girl put her hand into the moneybag and drew out a pebble. Without looking at it, she fumbled and let it fall onto the pebble-strewn path where it immediately became lost among all the other pebbles. "Oh, how clumsy of me," she said. "But never mind, if you look into the bag for the one that is left, you will be able to tell which pebble I picked."
Since the remaining pebble is black, it must be assumed that she had picked the white one. And since the money-lender dared not admit his dishonesty, the girl changed what seemed an impossible situation into an extremely advantageous one.
MORALE OF THE STORY:
Most complex problems do have a solution- it is, only, that we don't attempt to think.
From India, Pune
Hi Rajat,
Thanks for a thoughts-provoking story. As I was reading it I wondered what I would have done if I found myself in the girl's position.
While principles of logical thinking have dominated the intellectual world over a millenia, I find the theme of the story to necessitate development of principles for lateral-thinking. What do you think? Does any one have any ideas?
We might have a precedence about this in the book " Leading Quietly: An Unorthodox Guide to Doing the Right Thing" by Joseph L. Badaracco Jr.
Best Regards,
Moses J. Emanuel
From Tanzania, Dar Es Salaam
Thanks for a thoughts-provoking story. As I was reading it I wondered what I would have done if I found myself in the girl's position.
While principles of logical thinking have dominated the intellectual world over a millenia, I find the theme of the story to necessitate development of principles for lateral-thinking. What do you think? Does any one have any ideas?
We might have a precedence about this in the book " Leading Quietly: An Unorthodox Guide to Doing the Right Thing" by Joseph L. Badaracco Jr.
Best Regards,
Moses J. Emanuel
From Tanzania, Dar Es Salaam
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Five Ways ... To Avoid Snoopy Colleagues.pdf