15th February 2013
To
Mr. N.Krishna
Sal 1772, Engineering
S/o Sri Narayana Rao,
D.No.2-121, Sri Rama Nagar,
Gopalapatnam,
Vizag-530027.
CHARGE SHEET
It has been observed from the Time Office records that you have absented from duties unauthorisedly from 28/01/2013 to till date without prior sanction and without applying leave from your Department Head.
Unauthorized absence caused disruption of work and creating very severe constraints to the Company. Your unauthorized absence from duty resulted in dislocation of scheduled works and production target affected adversely. It amounts to misconduct as stated in Clause 24 of Sub Clauses 9, 52 & 54 of Certified Standing Orders of the Company detailed below:
Sub Clause 9: Habitual Late Attendance and Habitual Absence without leave or
Without sufficient cause.
Sub Clause 52: Breaching any or all the Leave Rules, Clauses.
Sub Clause 54: Riotous or disorderly behavior towards superiors / co-workers
during working hours in the premises of business of the Company
or outside or any act subversive to discipline in connection with
the work of the factory / company.
You are advised to report for duty and submit your explanation within 48 hours from the date of receipt of this Charge Sheet, as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you. Failure to do so will result in initiation on disciplinary proceedings against you.
Rajesh.K
Human Resources
From India, Kakinada
69To
Mr. N.Krishna
Sal 1772, Engineering
S/o Sri Narayana Rao,
D.No.2-121, Sri Rama Nagar,
Gopalapatnam,
Vizag-530027.
CHARGE SHEET
It has been observed from the Time Office records that you have absented from duties unauthorisedly from 28/01/2013 to till date without prior sanction and without applying leave from your Department Head.
Unauthorized absence caused disruption of work and creating very severe constraints to the Company. Your unauthorized absence from duty resulted in dislocation of scheduled works and production target affected adversely. It amounts to misconduct as stated in Clause 24 of Sub Clauses 9, 52 & 54 of Certified Standing Orders of the Company detailed below:
Sub Clause 9: Habitual Late Attendance and Habitual Absence without leave or
Without sufficient cause.
Sub Clause 52: Breaching any or all the Leave Rules, Clauses.
Sub Clause 54: Riotous or disorderly behavior towards superiors / co-workers
during working hours in the premises of business of the Company
or outside or any act subversive to discipline in connection with
the work of the factory / company.
You are advised to report for duty and submit your explanation within 48 hours from the date of receipt of this Charge Sheet, as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you. Failure to do so will result in initiation on disciplinary proceedings against you.
Rajesh.K
Human Resources
From India, Kakinada
Dear Rajesh
Why u want to post this type of legal letters in this type?
Problems in the letter
1 Date of prepared letter is to older than the displaying
2 No proof to the receipt ant
3 If you can send this letter by the Registered post it can be avidance
Lakshminaryana
From India, Hyderabad
Why u want to post this type of legal letters in this type?
Problems in the letter
1 Date of prepared letter is to older than the displaying
2 No proof to the receipt ant
3 If you can send this letter by the Registered post it can be avidance
Lakshminaryana
From India, Hyderabad
Dear Rajesh.K,
You have simply posted the letter of Charge Sheet addressed to Mr. N.Krishna without mentioning as to what you want us to do, It is so unfortunate that a man of Human Resources behaves in irrational and immature manner.Your action is nothing more than childish.If you have sufficient time please spend the same in a constructive way without wasting others time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
You have simply posted the letter of Charge Sheet addressed to Mr. N.Krishna without mentioning as to what you want us to do, It is so unfortunate that a man of Human Resources behaves in irrational and immature manner.Your action is nothing more than childish.If you have sufficient time please spend the same in a constructive way without wasting others time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Dear Rajesh,
Greetings!!!
I echo the views of BS Kalsi.
The letter that you have made public is a part of employee personal file which is confidential.
What if, the recipient of this letter sues you for making this information public.
From India, Delhi
Greetings!!!
I echo the views of BS Kalsi.
The letter that you have made public is a part of employee personal file which is confidential.
What if, the recipient of this letter sues you for making this information public.
From India, Delhi
Hello Rajesh,
Do you intend to defame/humiliate the addressee publicly? Is that the reason you published the internal official letter publicly?
The only positive point of this letter that it may be used as a "sample charge-sheet letter", and nothing else.
But neither this forum is the appropriate place to post it blindly without any good reason, nor this act is ethically advisable!
Best regards
From India, Kolkata
Do you intend to defame/humiliate the addressee publicly? Is that the reason you published the internal official letter publicly?
The only positive point of this letter that it may be used as a "sample charge-sheet letter", and nothing else.
But neither this forum is the appropriate place to post it blindly without any good reason, nor this act is ethically advisable!
Best regards
From India, Kolkata
for exp : Advisce How to wright replay letter It is use full for union leaders please aloberate. diferernt models please respond.
From India, Hyderabad
From India, Hyderabad
Dear Vasu kumar,
Please clarify what you want to say.I am sorry to say that neither your English spellings are correct nor the sentence speak some sense.My advise to you is to please have patience in building a proper and meaningful sentence for raising a query.Please check TWICE before mailing it.
I apologize in advance for being harsh.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Please clarify what you want to say.I am sorry to say that neither your English spellings are correct nor the sentence speak some sense.My advise to you is to please have patience in building a proper and meaningful sentence for raising a query.Please check TWICE before mailing it.
I apologize in advance for being harsh.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Dear Rajesh K,
If you could have mentioned the same sentence in your initial mail,there would not have been so much hullabaloo for your posting of charge sheet as a query and you would have saved yourself from the members' rebuke.However, it is better late than never.
Good day & have a nice time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
If you could have mentioned the same sentence in your initial mail,there would not have been so much hullabaloo for your posting of charge sheet as a query and you would have saved yourself from the members' rebuke.However, it is better late than never.
Good day & have a nice time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Translated charge sheet shrigopal soni.doc