Dear All,
If the Employer has not issued or issued any letter of appointment to an employee and continues to deduct the emplyers share ( both as applicable i.e. EPF and or ESI ) Is it a wrong practice? But i being a HR professional ,have come across some candidate whose salary slip does reflect similar elements in deduction column. and hence the take home salary comes lower side ( even if they are communicated the take home salary --on paper if appointment letter issued or verbal ) and on being asked they convenience the employee that it is also a part of their salary / CTC and it is perfectly right to deduct the employers share in this manner. What should be ?? and why it is so ??
Thanks and Regards,
From India, Delhi
2If the Employer has not issued or issued any letter of appointment to an employee and continues to deduct the emplyers share ( both as applicable i.e. EPF and or ESI ) Is it a wrong practice? But i being a HR professional ,have come across some candidate whose salary slip does reflect similar elements in deduction column. and hence the take home salary comes lower side ( even if they are communicated the take home salary --on paper if appointment letter issued or verbal ) and on being asked they convenience the employee that it is also a part of their salary / CTC and it is perfectly right to deduct the employers share in this manner. What should be ?? and why it is so ??
Thanks and Regards,
From India, Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
ESIC-Contributi on-Transfer-For m.pdf