Dear Ravi,
Your exactly got my point as you gave good example we discussed the same on our Citehr EHS forum earlier https://www.citehr.com/283383-earthing-taanker.html
So just treating camera flash as culprit for death of the boy is not right – I think so.
Yesterday I wrote a mail to Nikon technical department regarding this issue through online but I am get any response yet If I get it will share with us.
Keep on sharing. . .

From United States, Fpo
I have read almost all discussion, As i think this a just fake story, If you are getting information from that hospital, it may be this accident by other causes.
First of all i tell you, 40000 voltage is much higher to burn and ash the body. Its not possible that half body was burned and he lived 1-2 days. flash light comes in electro-magantic field (EMF). Sun light also comes EMF. if this incident is right then that current should pass everywhere through sun light medium
Am i right ? if it is not, i can show you the real demo at near 40000 volt anytime anywhere, Place and time your choice.
Raghavendra Singh

From India, Delhi
dipil
713

Dear Raghavendra Singh
Seems like this is your first posting in the forum...
Quite impressive one to start with...
Can you please introduce about yourself and the kind of expertise the forum members can expect from you?

From India
dear K RAVI did u know what type of camera he is used on that day...??? Did u know the camera name means reply to me i ll show how the electrical current passe through light...
From India, Coimbatore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.