"Gaurav's wife Tripti submitted an application to the Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, asking him to permit her to withdraw the names of Premji and
Kumar from the case."

--
That is the latest update.
Now my dear please reply:
What is this?
Any one can put some one's name and withdraw as per her wish?
What type of Justice system we have in our country?
Are media lisening this?
Who will pay the price for the defemation and damage done about the "Wipro"
work culture?
Or
It was a planned move to ensure that Gaurave should loose his job?
Let the whole nation decide , CNN IBN must take the Interview of Gaurave and his situation amd let the whole nation fight for the justice for Gaurav and his parents.
This is a simple misuse of law , which is a clear legal terrorism, nothing else.

From India, Delhi
Sidheshwar ji,

You can go to the google serch , all the information you will get.

Now the second thing is , there is no direct punishment if any one find to be false and in addition to that , there is no evidence is required to file any case.

See the example of Tripti case.

First she filed the 498a and send her husabnds mother behind the bar.

Then her husabnd go to high court , the proceding stay he got.

The she file domestic violence Act , her husabnd again go to high court , got stay .

As all the calim are wite lie.. which a small child also can understand.

Now she want to balme her own mistake to :Wipro" and also want to ensure that her husabnd must loose the Job.

So intentionally she filed this case and drag the Premji Name.

Result , her husband under pressure , but see when her husabnd prefer to speek up in media , till the time she was coming always , she change her stand and withdraw the case.

But please tell me the damage she had done to her husabnd and wipro work culture , will they get return?

And see our judges , simply allow her to withdraw the case , without asking a single question ?

So the question is is our LAw are made for a "Joke" or like ordering Pizza ?

Her i thing , wipro must set a example by filling a defemation and damarage case , so that other people should not dare to do such silly thing to defame a company's work culture and some one's carrer.

Please understand any dishonest women can drag to any HR manager( let it be men/women) of any Comany as per present Domestic Violence LAW.

The law is so badly drafted , that it will be paradise for Indian crook laywers to earn the money by such act, if corporate Managers does not take immediate step.

From India, Delhi
Friend, What you are talking is Domestic Harmony,
Something that Indian Mens and Family Rights Group have been talking of.
But Ironically SaveIndianFamily Helpline also gets many calls from Husbands where the wife is working in the same department and has filed a 498a and Adultery case on him. Husband has been arrested too on the statement of the wife.
In Gaurav's case too false 498a was filed in preDV era and moment DV came in to picture that too was ambitiously misused as a shree ganesh to the act. if the law is loose, misuse would enter.
again how do we avoid misuse on the touring husbands? that is where balance is needed in law in my humble opinion.
- Jinesh.


The Judicial system must strongly deal with frivolous complaints

and prosecutions by; for wasting court's precious time and putting

financial burden on public exchequer.

Preventing the miscarriage of justice, is just as much the work of the

Courts, as it is their work to uphold the law of the land.

The acquittal does not wipe out the ignominy suffered during and

prior to trial by the innocent accused family who were all arrested

without bail and jailed without committing any offence under section

498A of Indian Penal code.

Perjury (Statement that is false, made under oath) destroys the very foundations of the legal process as perversion of the truth is a 'crime

against justice'. It is about time that the Courts put to use sanction

and sentence "perjurers" as offenders, for their culpability.

Their attempts to usurp and mock the authority of the Courts, the legal process, the rule of law, and the law of the land, have to be thwarted for in doing so they are aiding and abetting the miscarriage of Justice

From United States, Philadelphia
Jinish,

Well said .

But the reality is , husabnd killing is not a crime in this country.

See the stastics , husabnds are getting killed 2.5 time higher than wifvs , UN giving false stastics , it seems in India Husabnd killing is a Social well fare , as I have seen some of the Husabnds killers getting movie award , goverment award .

So , it is the time , Indian husabnds have to fight for justice the way Gaurave does.

Latest uptate:

Gaurav's wife , drop the case against Premji, but judge had not asked a sinlge question or put ny fine ?

Wonder if the same had been done by a Husabnds , what should have the reaction from media !!

Why the laywers should not be sacked , who is musterminded against this dirty game plane?

Why the women orginasations , who ad adviced Tripti to play this dirty game should not be closed ?

A lot of question is unwasnsered .

Wonder , If a Husband put a alligation against his wife , the way Tripti had done against gaurave , will we have been keep mum?

Think and act all our respected group members here.

Let fight for truth irrespective of any sex or gander.

From India, Delhi
i read the sad fact, that now tripti wants her husband back. then why did she file a 498a? and got his old parents arrested for 3 days (I guess it was the famous friday formula).
then the misuse of DV and now when all fails, i read, she wants to come back.
Sadly a Guy's complaint can at max become a non cognizable offence that does not count in the national statistics of crime against men. where as a womens false complaints is also taken in to consideration as a criminal complaint that builds into statistics of national crime against women. thus misleading the junta. live example is gaurav's.
why aren't the court punishing the misusers suo-moto rather than putting the onus on the exhausted victim.
hindi movie Aitraaz was inspired from such events in real life. where there are no sections in the IPC exclusively for males against a lady. well forget the filmi blend but the reality of lies was exposed and for the family of husbands there is a lots to be cautious about.


"why aren't the court punishing the misusers suo-moto rather than putting the onus on the exhausted victim."
The hurdle lies in Cr.P.C. 195. For the above section 340 Cr.P.C. be repealed. Section 195 Cr.P.C. be amended to make trial and punishment against perjury mandatory(now it is discretionary) and power of trial and punishment be vested on the judge on whose court perjury is committed(now he can be only a complainant and be embroiled in litigation which no judge wants).
regards

From India, Delhi
and thus leaving the so called bechari with the option of a trial of misuse, thus adding false statistics and going scott free.
thus leaving the indian husbands and his family members at the mercy of the interpretation of the wife and no reality check and with only 2 options...
[_] henpecked -or-
[_] handcuffed
after repeated attempts to bring out attention why is government pretending sleep?
any scam?


This imbalance of one sided immediate arrests without reality check also defeats the legal maxim that states
"A thousand guilty men may escape the clutches of law but one innocent should not be punished for the crime that he has not committed"
498a is wife centric and not women centric as it arrests the women (mother and sister of husband) too for investigation.
In DV, The complainent cannot be male, the respondent cannot be female (mothers and sisters of husband seem to be exceptions if wife is complaining). (as mother and sister of husband along with husband were arrested in pune recently under DV)
according to the law books the wife cannot be guilty as there are no special provisions to initiate prosecution against her if guilty.
Gosh what an imbalance and what an insult to the indian men.


To start repairing imbalancement, Earlier in this thread I have suggested amendment of Article 51-A(e) of the constitution of India from which imbalancement starts in 1976. It requires addition of just "and men". On principle I think every one will support but to add these two words a bill needs to be introduced in the parliament and be passed with 2/3rd majority of the members present.
What do you do?
regards

From India, Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.