Difference between Focusing on Problems and Focusing on Solutions

Case 1

When NASA began the launch of astronauts into space, they found out that the pens wouldn't work at zero gravity (ink won't flow down to the writing surface).

To solve this problem, it took them one decade and $12 million. They developed a pen that worked at zero gravity, upside down, underwater, in practically any surface including crystal and in a temperature range from below freezing to over 300 degrees C.

And what did the Russians do...?? They used a pencil.

Case 2

One of the most memorable case studies on Japanese management was the case of the empty soapbox, which happened in one of Japan 's biggest cosmetics companies. The company received a complaint that a consumer had bought a soapbox that was empty. Immediately the authorities isolated the problem to the assembly! line, which transported all the packaged boxes of soap to the delivery department. For some reason, one soapbox went through the assembly line empty. Management asked its engineers to solve the problem.

Post-haste, the engineers worked hard to devise an X-ray machine with high-resolution monitors manned by two people to watch all the soapboxes that passed through the line to make sure they were not empty. No doubt, they worked hard and they worked fast but they spent a whoopee amount to do so.

But when a rank-and-file employee in a small company was posed with the same problem, he did not get into complications of X-rays, etc., but instead came out with another solution. He bought a strong industrial electric fan and pointed it at the assembly line. He switched the fan on, and as each soapbox passed the fan, it simply blew the empty boxes out of the line.

Moral:

Always look for simple solutions. Devise the simplest possible solution that solves the problems. Always focus on solutions & not on problems.

So the end of the day the thing that really matters is HOW ONE LOOK INTO THE PROBLEM and Resolve early.

Cheers

Sudandira

From India, Madras
regarding the first example:

If you've ever tried to write on a piece of paper taped to the wall with a ball point pen, you know that they need gravity to work properly. It is true that the space program needed to devise an alternative writing implement for the zero gravity conditions of space, but that's where this chain's accuracies end.

This version states the development of the pen cost $12 million. There are versions that put the cost as low as $1.5 million and as high as $12 billion. Guess, someone along the way thought that if it was outrageous at $12 million, it would be 1000 times as outrageous at $12 billion.

But, as Snopes.com points out, the Fisher Space Pen, specifically designed for the space program, cost NASA just $2.95 each (contrast that with a retail price of $20-80 a pop). The manufacturers of the pen also point out that the Russian's pencil solution is problematic because of the possibility of debris. So, this is just one more example of out-of-this-world government spending that just doesn't have any space legs.

:-)

regards

Pavel Chopra


Hai Friend, It was extremely superb expect lot of such kind of insights I hope i can get it Cheers, roby

Dear Sudandira, Thank you soooooooooo much for this posting really i agree and also suggest to other members to adopt this things in our life and in work culture. Regards Gururaj :D
From India
Hi! Sudandira, This is really fabulous, human mind is really complicated n we tend to overlook simple solution cuz of tht! grt posting! Deepak
From India, Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.