Dear Friends,

I am working in a organization in Quality assurance, As we see they no adherence to process in spite of educating the employees. So we have planned to map the Process adherence to be performance appraisal.

I would like to categorize the process deviation as Minor / Major / Critical and map it to performance appraisal. So it may a negative results when no.of minor/major & critical.

Please help to set up this & differentiate the deviation like Minor/Major/Critical.

Thanks & Regards

Vinod

From India, Bangalore
Dear Vinod,
As per my opinion, you can go through the performance rating of the employees of last 3 years...
Through this rating you can identify who are the major key performers and major non key performers....Similarly the same process can be carried out to identify the minor and critical performers and non performers....
After this process of identification you can impart raining for dead woods (non performers), stabalise and motivate the emloyees who are performing but getting average rating and give new projects to stars (high performers)....

From India, Mumbai
Dear Ankit,
Thank you for the response, We have just started the Performance appraisal system so their's no records of rating for the employees.I have started the regular weekly audit and Process Deviation Reports are maintained. We found the are many deviation from the QMS process being followed. So we thought of categorizing the activity the teams do into critical/Major/Minor and no.of critical errors being committed by an individual will have a negative rating on the performance.

Thanks & Regards

Vinod

From India, Bangalore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.